About case laws on partial partition of joint properties
About case laws on partial partition of joint properties
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
As a result of recent amendment, the court imposed a more severe sentence than would have been probable under the previous Variation in the regulation.
limitation of liability on the extent of a cap provided by the registered mortgage deed(Banking Legislation)
Subscription access exclusively for organizations/businesses (SCC ID essential) to criminal and traffic case information within the general district courts with the purpose of confirming an individual’s date of birth.
extensive period petitioner was not deemed for promotion, meeting on the departmental promotion committee and think about the petitioner (Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It is additionally a well-proven proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
(Interview by email, with Ahmad Rafay Alam, a leading environmental lawyer and activist in Pakistan, August twenty eighth, 2015). Furthermore, the ruling placed a notice and comment restriction on government agencies in regards to projects that could most likely pose a public risk. This case is additionally noteworthy, “because it laid down the foundations of all future public interest litigation introduced before courts for environmental protection.” To cite just one example, following this case, the Supreme Court, citing the Zia decision, found from the Salt Miners Case (decided on 12th July, 1994) that the right to have water free from pollution and contamination is really a right to life itself.
six. Mere involvement in a very heinous offence isn't any ground for refusing bail to an accused who otherwise becomes entitled for that concession of bail. The petitioner namely Bhoora was arrested in this case on 08.05.2018, given that then He's behind the bars, He's previous non-convict, never involved in any case, investigation qua him is complete, his person isn't any more demanded for further investigation, therefore, his constant incarceration would not serve any useful purpose at this stage.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, together with eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature with the seized currency.
The regulation of necessity identified and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called law of necessity..
The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to get gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights to encompass the right to your healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there are no specific provisions while in the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it really is important that the case proven the application with the precautionary principle where there is actually a menace to environmental rights, and emphasised the positive obligations on the State in protecting the right into a clean and special cases of first law of thermodynamics healthy environment.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.